An International Women’s Day Special

    The 8th of March marks International Women’s Day. The macroeconomic backdrop has improved for women in Australia over the past year, mostly as a result of better labour market conditions and the Labor government’s policies to reduce the cost of childcare. We look at these issues in this edition of Econosights.

    7 min read

    Diana Mousina

    Deputy Chief Economist, AMP

    Published

    07/03/2025

    Introduction

    The 8th of March marks International Women’s Day. The macroeconomic backdrop has improved for women in Australia over the past year, mostly as a result of better labour market conditions and the Labor government’s policies to reduce the cost of childcare. We look at these issues in this edition of Econosights.

    Women in the Australian labour market

    The female participation rate (the number of women either employed or unemployed as a share of the labour market) has risen over the past year to a new record high of 63.5%, from 62.6% a year ago. The male participation rate has also risen to 71.3%, from 70.5% a year ago. Female participation is well above the ~43% that was recorded in 1978. The pandemic has led to a big step-up in female particiaption, relative to males. This has occurred from higher work flexibility post-pandemic and the increase in jobs in the care economy, which have a higher female share.

    australia labour force participation rate

    Source: Macrobond, AMP

    In Australia, nearly 43% of women in the labour market work part-time, more than double the 20% of men who work part-time.

    australia underemployment by gender

    Source: Macrobond, AMP

    The higher rate of part-time participation by females partly explains higher “underemployment” (i.e. some females wanting to work more hours). Female underemployment is 7.5% and males is 5.2% (see the chart above). Although, female underemployment has fallen to its lowest period on record (outside of the pandemic distortions).

    The main reason that women who wanted a job but were unavailable to work is is because they are caring for children (see the chart below) , which is the same as a year ago.

    main reason not available to work for mothers

    Source: ABS, AMP

    Of the females that said that childcare was the main barrier to workforce participation (and wanted a job), the main reason that it was an issue for them was because care was not available, followed by the kids being too young for care. This is a change compared to a year ago when the biggest barrier to labour force participation was women indicating that they preferred to look after kids. It was interesting to see that childcare being too expensive was now the least common reason as a barrier to participation. This is probably due to numerous government policies implemented in the Albanese government reducing childcare costs and activity tests required to access care.

    main reason childcare a barrier to participation for women

    Source: ABS, AMP

    The gender pay gap

    The gender pay gap refers to the difference in earnings from work for males and females for a full-time equivalent person. According to the OECD, there is an 11.5% difference in male and female pay across OECD countries (see the chart below) with Australia doing better than the average at 10.7%. Lower earnings in working life carries through to retirement and the impact gets compounded as balances grow. This is clear in the superannuation statistics, with the average female aged 60-64 having $300,717 in superannuation, which is 21% less than her male peer at $380,737.

    oecd gender pay gap

    Source: OECD, AMP

    Unconscious gender biases in the workplace are still a big problem and need to be continually improved, but the other two main reasons for the difference in earnings between genders is the line of work undertaken and the decision to have children which takes time out of the workforce and can then result in a change of role or moving to part-time work. There is a significantly higher share of females in service-based industries (see the chart below) of health care and social assistance and education which are typically less lucrative, have higher flexibility around hours of work and require less travel requirements. While male dominance in manual industries like construction, mining, transport and postal, electricity, gas and water services and the manufacturing industries are typically paid higher rates because they are associated with less flexible hours and risky and manual work. There is probably also some societal bias that has typically placed less value on “softer” services skills.

    Over the year to November 2024, the sectors that had the largest increase in employment were accomodation and food services, education and training and rental, hiring and real estate services. The sectors that had the largest falls in jobs were manufacturing, wholesale trade and arts and recreation services. So in the past year, women have benefitted from the growth in service-based jobs.

    percentage of labour in eachindustry

    Source: ABS, AMP

    The difference in male and female job careers starts before the workplace. The chart below looks at HSC school enrollments in subjects with the biggest gender gaps. Females continue to dominate in subjects like textiles and design, society and culture, Aboriginal studies and food technology while males are still significantly dominating in engineering studies, software design and industrial technology. This was the same as a year ago. The drop in economics enrolments, especially for females has also been a longer-term trend and is concerning because of its impact on financial literacy.

    2024 hsc enrolments by gender

    Source: NSW Government, AMP

    What policies can help these issues

    The changes from the Labor government to reduce childcare fees for families over the past year has been very encouraging. Paid parental leave policies in Australia are still not quite as generous compared to global peers that are having better results in reducing the gender pay gap (although its unclear if they will ever be as generous). There is also a case to look at further early childhood funding from the government (particuarly in the pre-school years). The countries that do the best on gender equality all have very generous parental leave schemes and universal access to early childcare. However, these policies argue for further spending which will be difficult in the near-term given recent legislation for the sector, constraints on further increases to government spending and concerns around stoking inflation from further government spending.

    A more budget-friendly measure that can be achieved quicker would be to invest in improving female financial and economic literacy. We know that Australian female financial literacy is lagging behind males more than our global peers. This is occuring from a young age. There is a need for schools and families to expose girls and women to understanding the basics of investing and the implications that this on long-term returns through the impacts of compound interest. Teaching girls at a high school level the possible career pathways (and financial consequences) of the subjects that are taken at school is also important, especially in today’s world where tech is going to cause some change to how we work in the long-term.

    From a societal point of view, there needs to be continued cultural change accepting fathers taking time off from work to look after the family, equally share the tasks of domestic unpaid work and encouraging a more holistic perspective on the work-life balance. The countries that tend to do the best in terms of gender equality and life balance are those with very generous welfare systems (that allow long leave periods) where equality within the family is ingrained in the culture.

     

    Diana Mousina, Deputy Chief Economist, AMP

    Important note

    While every care has been taken in the preparation of this document, neither National Mutual Funds Management Ltd (ABN 32 006 787 720, AFSL 234652) (NMFM), AMP Limited ABN 49 079 354 519 nor any other member of the AMP Group (AMP) makes any representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of any statement in it including, without limitation, any forecasts. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

    This document has been prepared for the purpose of providing general information, without taking account of any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. An investor should, before making any investment decisions, consider the appropriateness of the information in this document, and seek professional advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation and needs. This document is solely for the use of the party to whom it is provided.

    This document is not intended for distribution or use in any jurisdiction where it would be contrary to applicable laws, regulations or directives and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, solicitation or invitation to invest.